<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;The San Carlos Week In Review&#8221; for the week ending 11/29/08</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whiteoaksblog.com/2008/11/29/the-san-carlos-week-in-review-for-the-week-ending-112908/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whiteoaksblog.com/2008/11/29/the-san-carlos-week-in-review-for-the-week-ending-112908/</link>
	<description>If it happens in San Carlos, it&#039;s in here...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:46:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://whiteoaksblog.com/2008/11/29/the-san-carlos-week-in-review-for-the-week-ending-112908/#comment-3331</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 03:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whiteoaksblog.com/2008/11/29/the-san-carlos-week-in-review-for-the-week-ending-112908/#comment-3331</guid>
		<description>Hi Fred,

Great questions.  I don&#039;t have any insight into why it sold at such an aggressive price.  It&#039;s a nice home, and I know it was on the market for quite awhile under a couple of different brokerages.  But I would be speculating as to why it sold that price.

Regarding your second questions,  there has indeed been a trend of declining prices in San Carlos over the past two quarters.  Cash-strong buyers clearly have the upper hand, and are getting some very good deals.   Offers that would have been considered an insult a year ago are now actually being entertained in some cases.

That being said, I still believe that this particular data-point is much more of an anomaly than a new benchmark, for two reasons.  First, despite all of the price declines to hit San Carlos this year, the average sales price in White Oaks over the past 6 months is still $654/sq ft, so Chestnut&#039;s price of $444/sq ft is simply off the charts.  Of the 35 homes that closed in this period, only 4 (or roughly 10%) closed below $500/sq foot.  So from a statistical perspective, it&#039;s an anomaly.

The second reason I don&#039;t think this will become the norm is that the majority of homeowners in White Oaks simply won&#039;t sell their homes this low.  I have seen at least half a dozen homeowners that have chosen to pull their homes off the market and either move back in, or rent them out as opposed to selling them at such a steep discount.  With rents still holding strong in this market, it&#039;s a smart strategy.

Does this mean that you won&#039;t see any more of these &quot;amazing deals&quot;?  Not at all.  It&#039;s clearly a buyer&#039;s market now, and people simply have to sell.  But I don&#039;t see prices this low becoming the norm.

I hope this answers your question.

Chuck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Fred,</p>
<p>Great questions.  I don&#8217;t have any insight into why it sold at such an aggressive price.  It&#8217;s a nice home, and I know it was on the market for quite awhile under a couple of different brokerages.  But I would be speculating as to why it sold that price.</p>
<p>Regarding your second questions,  there has indeed been a trend of declining prices in San Carlos over the past two quarters.  Cash-strong buyers clearly have the upper hand, and are getting some very good deals.   Offers that would have been considered an insult a year ago are now actually being entertained in some cases.</p>
<p>That being said, I still believe that this particular data-point is much more of an anomaly than a new benchmark, for two reasons.  First, despite all of the price declines to hit San Carlos this year, the average sales price in White Oaks over the past 6 months is still $654/sq ft, so Chestnut&#8217;s price of $444/sq ft is simply off the charts.  Of the 35 homes that closed in this period, only 4 (or roughly 10%) closed below $500/sq foot.  So from a statistical perspective, it&#8217;s an anomaly.</p>
<p>The second reason I don&#8217;t think this will become the norm is that the majority of homeowners in White Oaks simply won&#8217;t sell their homes this low.  I have seen at least half a dozen homeowners that have chosen to pull their homes off the market and either move back in, or rent them out as opposed to selling them at such a steep discount.  With rents still holding strong in this market, it&#8217;s a smart strategy.</p>
<p>Does this mean that you won&#8217;t see any more of these &#8220;amazing deals&#8221;?  Not at all.  It&#8217;s clearly a buyer&#8217;s market now, and people simply have to sell.  But I don&#8217;t see prices this low becoming the norm.</p>
<p>I hope this answers your question.</p>
<p>Chuck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://whiteoaksblog.com/2008/11/29/the-san-carlos-week-in-review-for-the-week-ending-112908/#comment-3329</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whiteoaksblog.com/2008/11/29/the-san-carlos-week-in-review-for-the-week-ending-112908/#comment-3329</guid>
		<description>Chuck - 

What do you think the deal was with 1381 Chestnut St? While the property has what looks like no backyard, the price drop seems pretty significant for White Oaks - trend or anomaly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck &#8211; </p>
<p>What do you think the deal was with 1381 Chestnut St? While the property has what looks like no backyard, the price drop seems pretty significant for White Oaks &#8211; trend or anomaly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
